|
| |||
|
AsiaTODAY latest news stories AskASIA educational resource AsiaFOOD Asian food resource AsiaSTORE online bookstore AsiaPROFILES maps & statistics AsiaVIEWS articles & speeches AsiaLINKS related links AsiaEXPERTS specialists database AsiaEVENTS worldwide calendar AsiainNYC cultural travel guide AsiaBULLETIN email updates
|
|
agreement implicitly recognized the MNLF as the official representative
of Philippine Muslims and accorded it belligerent state status. The terms of the agreement
were also quite favorable to MNLF demands. The cease-fire went into effect in late
January, 1977 and was generally successful for about nine months. Talks were begun
in February on the implementation of the peace settlement, and very soon broke down
over widely divergent interpretations of the key terms of the agreement. Marcos then
proceeded to "implement" the Tripoli Agreement on his own terms, principally by creating
two special "autonomous" regions, one for Central Mindanao and the other for Sulu.
The Marcos administration gained substantial benefits from signing the Tripoli Agreement;
it obtained a much needed breathing spell from the economic drain of the war and from
the considerable diplomatic pressure for settlement coming from the Middle East.
In retrospect it seems clear that President Marcos never sincerely intended
to implement the agreement as signed.
Although the cease-fire collapsed in much of the South before the year was out, the fighting never again approached the level of intensity experienced before 1976. After the signing of the agreement, the rate of defections from the MNLF accelerated, its support from foreign sources was reduced, and dissension intensified in its top ranks, eventually leading to a schism and the creation of a second separatist organization, the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF). The armed Muslim separatist threat to the martial law state remained significant but was no longer an immediate one. The "autonomous" regional governments devised by the Marcos administration in the South have been aptly described as "essentially hollow, and productive of cynicism, frustration, and resentment" (Noble 1983:49). The governing bodies of the nominally autonomous regions were cosmetic creations with no real legislative authority and no independent operating budget. They were headed by martial law collaborators and rebel defectors. By 1983, the regional governments had developed a layer of bureaucracy that employed a number of college-educated Muslims, but the great majority of Muslims were completely unaffected by the new regional administrations. For the first nine years of its formal existence, Muslim autonomy in the Philippine state had virtually no political reality. Copyright © . Asia Society. All rights reserved. Please click here for legal restrictions and terms of use applicable to this site and Asia Society's Privacy Policy. |