|
November 13, 2003
Mekong versus Metookong
China appears more serious on sub-regional cooperation than India
The historic city of Dali famous for its Three Pagodas and located in the southwest Chinese province of Yunnan recently hosted the ministerial meeting of the Greater Mekong Subregion Economic Cooperation Programme. Coordinated by the Asian Development Bank (ADB), this programme involves China, Thailand, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia and Myanmar with Yunnan being the main torchbearer on behalf of China. The programme was launched in 1992 and over the past eleven years, around $ 1 billion has been piut on the ground in power and transport projects. But it was only last November in Phnom Penh that the six heads-of state met for the first time to give the programme a renewed political momentum and chart a ten-year strategic framework for cooperation in diverse areas like energy, health, education, environment, transport, tourism and telecommunications. Coming almost a year after this summit, the Dali meeting assumed special importance. It reiterated the commitment of the six countries to the three Cs--connectivity, competitiveness and community-in the region.
In an apparent bid to counter the Chinese, India too has made a foray into the Mekong Basin. In July 2000, with much fanfare and recalling its ancient links to the region, India announced a Ganga-Mekong Swarnabhoomi Project involving India, Thailand, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia and Myanmar leaving out China where, incidentally, the Mekong originates. The project was grand in scope envisaging cooperation in areas like road and rail infrastructure, tourism, IT and education. But unlike the Chinese-backed initiative in the Mekong Basin, the Indian-championed project is floundering. True, over the past year Mr. Atal Bihari Vajpayee has had successful visits to Cambodia, Laos and Thailand, apart from to China as well. The statement issued after the first ASEAN-India summit in Phnom Penh in November 2002 reaffirmed mutual interest in the Mekong-Ganga Project and also highlighted India's desire to participate in the Greater Mekong Programme. How these fine words and sentiments will translate into actual projects and investments by India remains to be seen. But Sanskritic chauvinism is the wrong way to go about winning friends. The website of the Indian Ministry of External Affairs makes the ludicrous claim that Mekong comes from Ma Ganga. And Mr. Jaswant Singh was forced to drop the word Swarnabhoomi when the Vientiane Declaration formally announcing the Mekong-Ganga initiative was adopted in November 2000.
|